<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hack Day London 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/18/hack-day-london-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/18/hack-day-london-2007/</link>
	<description>UK-based weblog on technology, queerness, language and fitness</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bitful</title>
		<link>http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/18/hack-day-london-2007/#comment-4936</link>
		<dc:creator>bitful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/18/hack-day-london-2007/#comment-4936</guid>
		<description>Ah, the pink. The pink is most likely coming back; I am attached to it as it has been there since the very beginning, and to me at least it is and always will be the defining imagery for bitful.

I guess part of my stripping this website bare has got a lot to do with &lt;a href="http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/15/how-to-manage-multiple-online-identities/" rel="nofollow"&gt;my thoughts on online identity&lt;/a&gt;, and the need I cannot keep ignoring of owning up to what I do here with selected colleagues and friends: I want to see if having a simple, anonymous interface would make it easier to direct people here.

Ideally, I should be proud of my loud pink, which of course I am, but at the same time I don't want people to stop there without delving any deeper.

As I said in &lt;a href="http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/17/dude-wheres-my-design/" rel="nofollow"&gt;my previous post on the design change&lt;/a&gt;, by stripping everying off I wanted to see how much my readers (and I) would miss certain elements. It's working already :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the pink. The pink is most likely coming back; I am attached to it as it has been there since the very beginning, and to me at least it is and always will be the defining imagery for bitful.</p>
<p>I guess part of my stripping this website bare has got a lot to do with <a href="http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/15/how-to-manage-multiple-online-identities/" rel="nofollow">my thoughts on online identity</a>, and the need I cannot keep ignoring of owning up to what I do here with selected colleagues and friends: I want to see if having a simple, anonymous interface would make it easier to direct people here.</p>
<p>Ideally, I should be proud of my loud pink, which of course I am, but at the same time I don&#039;t want people to stop there without delving any deeper.</p>
<p>As I said in <a href="http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/17/dude-wheres-my-design/" rel="nofollow">my previous post on the design change</a>, by stripping everying off I wanted to see how much my readers (and I) would miss certain elements. It&#039;s working already :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/18/hack-day-london-2007/#comment-4934</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitful.com/2007/06/18/hack-day-london-2007/#comment-4934</guid>
		<description>OMG. Bitful... I know it's superficial and all, but I miss the pink bits. I know the content's largely the same as ever, it still functions much as before and is just as entertaining, informative and useful, but I like things that come in nice packages. I mean, isn't it nice to be surrounded by beauty even if it has no intrinsic value other than its mere loveliness?

Which brings me to the Hack Day t-shirts flickr group. OMG and ROLF. Seriously, those dudes probably function perfectly well and are informative, useful, and probably quite entertaining, but do they -like- compete to see who can look the most nerdy? Not much attention paid to appearance there.

Were they the inspiration for your makeover? "Wait a sec... these guys aren't much to look at, but yet they know how to do protocol on a rib site with minimum precedence lossage - cool! That's what Bitful should be like!"

I know this is a blog on technology, so perhaps this new minimal look is well suited. But isn't it also a blog on queerness? And don't all us queers want to look simply fabulous all the time?

Nevertheless, I'm still lovin' your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG. Bitful&#8230; I know it&#039;s superficial and all, but I miss the pink bits. I know the content&#039;s largely the same as ever, it still functions much as before and is just as entertaining, informative and useful, but I like things that come in nice packages. I mean, isn&#039;t it nice to be surrounded by beauty even if it has no intrinsic value other than its mere loveliness?</p>
<p>Which brings me to the Hack Day t-shirts flickr group. OMG and ROLF. Seriously, those dudes probably function perfectly well and are informative, useful, and probably quite entertaining, but do they -like- compete to see who can look the most nerdy? Not much attention paid to appearance there.</p>
<p>Were they the inspiration for your makeover? &#034;Wait a sec&#8230; these guys aren&#039;t much to look at, but yet they know how to do protocol on a rib site with minimum precedence lossage - cool! That&#039;s what Bitful should be like!&#034;</p>
<p>I know this is a blog on technology, so perhaps this new minimal look is well suited. But isn&#039;t it also a blog on queerness? And don&#039;t all us queers want to look simply fabulous all the time?</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I&#039;m still lovin&#039; your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
